Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 75% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	20.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170809
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '19 at 18:26
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	67%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1900X-$110 7,071 User benchmarks, average bench 76% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 71.8 1-Core 115 2-Core 215 74% 134 Pts	4-Core 399 8-Core 715 67% 557 Pts	64-Core 1,160 72% 1,160 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 37B3) ≥ 4GB; GV-N2080AORUS-8GC CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	105% Outstanding	Lighting 136 Reflection 129 Parallax 141 111% 135 fps	MRender 154 Gravity 122 Splatting 89.7 96% 122 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 126GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 200 209 204 208 206 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Read 420 Write 389 Mixed 344 SusWrite 230 78% 346 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 51.7 4K Mixed 31.2 104% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 354 244% 296 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235 44,466 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 85GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 304 296 302 297 293 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	68.7% Good	Read 322 Write 308 Mixed 297 SusWrite 300 69% 306 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 43.3 4K Mixed 30.2 95% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 170 129% 171 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235 44,466 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 1.5TB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 391 380 389 383 376 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Read 418 Write 406 Mixed 388 SusWrite 386 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 53.4 4K Mixed 32 106% 36.5 MB/s	DQ Read 228 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 112 135% 231 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 133%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$130 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 978GB free Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 386 374 384 377 371 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Read 371 Write 393 Mixed 326 SusWrite 380 83% 367 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 46.9 4K Mixed 22.6 78% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 182 162% 239 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 105%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$130 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 978GB free Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 385 375 384 377 371 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Read 368 Write 384 Mixed 335 SusWrite 380 83% 367 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 23.8 80% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 161 160% 254 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 105%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 671GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 53 53 52 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 97.7 Write 89.3 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 52.6 60% 80.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 67%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 501GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 126 123 126 123 125 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	68% Good	Read 112 Write 92.5 Mixed 69.7 SusWrite 125 73% 99.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x16GB 9,340 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.8% Below average	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 11 MC Mixed 12.6 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 12.4 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 97.3 41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 125%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 121%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $29

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	247x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $798Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	71x
Ryzen TR 2990WXAMD $790Bench 79%, 3,658 samples	35x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	97x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	33x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $630Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	21x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	20x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	16x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 105%, 6,151 samples	17x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $127Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	17x
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 109%, 1,628 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $834

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16