Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory57.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20181102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '19 at 03:58
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$455
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 74.3
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 205
71% 127 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 846
77% 646 Pts
64-Core 1,768
109% 1,768 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.1% Below average
Lighting 36.5
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 32.9
30% 33.2 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 36.1
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
787GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1131 1103 826 1100 1083 1069 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,046
Write 1,314
Mixed 1,134
SusWrite 1052
309% 1,386 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 65.4
235% 85.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,244
DQ Write 891
DQ Mixed 1153
838% 1,096 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 266%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
488GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 326 341 331 323 320 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 430
Write 424
Mixed 352
SusWrite 325
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 38.6
127% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 282
210% 279 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 133%
Seagate SkyHawk 6TB (2016)-$143
5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 211 212 208 220 219 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 108%
Seagate SkyHawk 6TB (2016)-$143
5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 207 210 209 213 218 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$139
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
88.9% Excellent
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 48.2
MC Mixed 29.9
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 8.5
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,131
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback