Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory17.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180403
Uptime11.6 Days
Run DateJan 02 '19 at 18:32
Run Duration303 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 133
2-Core 264
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 822
77% 641 Pts
64-Core 1,052
65% 1,052 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB; NE51070H15P2-1041G, Palit GTX 1070 GameRock Premium Edition
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 116
Parallax 97.5
90% 108 fps
MRender 98.4
Gravity 103
Splatting 103
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 247 194 130 112 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 461
Write 423
Mixed 109
SusWrite 200
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 19.3
83% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 129
112% 169 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 92%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB
8GB free
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 494
Write 463
Mixed 396
101% 451 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 61.6
208% 73.6 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 122%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
161GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 825 537 299 299 301 301 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,880
Write 1,465
Mixed 712
SusWrite 427
248% 1,121 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 53.7
205% 78.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,176
DQ Write 1,100
DQ Mixed 701
646% 992 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 214%
Great: 236%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 14 18 18 14 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 146
Write 140
Mixed 96
SusWrite 17.1
74% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
295GB free
Firmware: MJAOA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 48 46 47 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 114
Write 102
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 45.8
54% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
86% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 91%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
820GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 36 34 36 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 48
Write 62
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 35
31% 42.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 54 53 57 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 88.5
Write 102
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 52.2
58% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.5
189% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 90%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
411GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 17 20 20 16 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 95.5
Write 108
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 19.7
58% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 83%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95
95GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 16 20 20 16 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 117
Write 108
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 19.7
56% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 108%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
183GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 24 29 29 26 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 67.8
Write 69.2
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 29.7
39% 52.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
69.6% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 22.6
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 21.3
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback