PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 77.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-MA790XT-UD4P (all builds) |
Memory | 9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120817 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 02 '19 at 15:06 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
64.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290-$399
Sapphire(174B E289) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.2
|
53.9%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
270GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 230 229 233 233 226 MB/s
|
77.7%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$90
175GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 75 75 75 75 MB/s
|
43%
Average
|
|||
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
447GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 83 83 83 83 MB/s
|
38.3%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
|
37.6%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 25x |
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples | 11x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 11x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 5x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 5x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 91% - Outstanding | Total price: $142 |