Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5570 2,341 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 68.7 2-Core 141 62% 100 Pts	4-Core 217 8-Core 461 40% 339 Pts	64-Core 716 44% 716 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gainward(10B0 1401) 2GB CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.2% Below average	Lighting 43.2 Reflection 42.5 Parallax 38.1 35% 41.2 fps	MRender 33.7 Gravity 39.1 Splatting 34.7 29% 35.8 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 222 222 219 222 221 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55.2% Above average	Read 233 Write 216 Mixed 186 SusWrite 212 48% 212 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 43.7 4K Mixed 25 78% 28 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 163 128% 177 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 129%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 94GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 44 42 44 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	22.9% Poor	Read 36.7 Write 53 Mixed 45 SusWrite 42.8 33% 44.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.4 104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 59%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47 10,399 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3GB free Firmware: 3.ADJ SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 44 42 43 36 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Read 37.2 Write 34.5 Mixed 29 SusWrite 40.4 26% 35.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BAFP-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BAFP-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BAFP-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BAFP-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BAFP-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BAFP-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ41HE4BAFP-DJ-E ID:... 82GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.8% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 18.3 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 8.4 27% 9.4 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	188x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	15x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16