MSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A94
MotherboardMSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94)  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171122
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 31 '18 at 10:51
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9800X-$545
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 78.4
1-Core 146
2-Core 261
89% 162 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 1,151
104% 875 Pts
64-Core 1,622
100% 1,622 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Asus(1043 859B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 147
Parallax 126
108% 135 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 132
Splatting 108
96% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1955 827 618 618 622 622 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
257% Outstanding
Read 2,039
Write 1,936
Mixed 1,461
SusWrite 877
354% 1,578 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 66.4
242% 91.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,155
DQ Write 994
DQ Mixed 1,069
803% 1,073 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 257%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
262GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1713 953 593 593 592 593 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 2,115
Write 1,969
Mixed 1,578
SusWrite 839
364% 1,625 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 67.9
246% 93 MB/s
DQ Read 1,266
DQ Write 1,121
DQ Mixed 1,188
892% 1,192 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 265%
Great: 340%
Samsung 860 EVO 250G 250GB
29GB free
Firmware: 0117
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 314 305 305 302 304 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 367
Write 372
Mixed 350
SusWrite 318
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 26.3
85% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 65.9
DQ Write 51.3
DQ Mixed 60.1
45% 59.1 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 122%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
42GB free
Firmware: 0117
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 304 303 303 304 302 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 364
Write 367
Mixed 340
SusWrite 312
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 25.5
84% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 66.4
DQ Write 51.9
DQ Mixed 60.6
45% 59.6 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
87.4% Excellent
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 46
MC Mixed 27.3
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 10.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94) Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $796
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback