HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP Z800 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory	5.6 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110311
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 31 '18 at 09:55
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	28%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620 5,965 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 81.9 1-Core 40.2 2-Core 106 48% 75.9 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 387 35% 296 Pts	64-Core 597 37% 597 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28% Poor	Lighting 40.3 Reflection 31.8 Parallax 38.6 33% 36.9 fps	MRender 39.2 Gravity 39.2 Splatting 0.04 19% 26.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB 3,057 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5G04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 88 80 95 103 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Read 113 Write 118 Mixed 77 SusWrite 94.3 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.2 231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 79%
Seagate Portable 1TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 65GB free, PID 2101 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 17 19 19 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 25.3 Mixed 24.3 SusWrite 18.6 32% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 45%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 300GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 17 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 29.3 Write 25.5 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 18.5 30% 23.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 46GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46% Average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 16.9 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 8 22% 7.87 GB/s	Latency 77 52% 77 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	188x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

GPU
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	161x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	87x
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples	67x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16