Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N4200 10,928 User benchmarks, average bench 30% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	Memory 41.5 1-Core 34.7 2-Core 63.8 29% 46.7 Pts	4-Core 91 8-Core 102 13% 96.5 Pts	64-Core 91.1 6% 91.1 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 7,629 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749 Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	1.13% Terrible	Lighting 0.97 Reflection 1.77 Parallax 1.12 1% 1.29 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 1.97 Splatting 2.61 2% 2.14 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.13% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF4500RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 37 88 40 125 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	28.9% Poor	Read 310 Write 237 Mixed 229 SusWrite 100 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 8.3 4K Mixed 8.5 26% 7.9 MB/s	DQ Read 41.3 DQ Write 59 DQ Mixed 28.4 28% 42.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 56%
WDC WD75 00BPKT-00PK4T0 750GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 71GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 34 35 36 35 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Read 36.4 Write 34.8 Mixed 28.7 SusWrite 34.3 45% 33.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unde HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 1x4GB 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.3% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 8 26% 8.93 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 3.9 10% 3.57 GB/s	Latency 195 20% 195 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16