Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181102
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 21 '18 at 22:55
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$455
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Memory 85.9
1-Core 140
2-Core 280
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 1,107
98% 831 Pts
64-Core 1,952
121% 1,952 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 417.35
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 68% Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT09B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 94 88 92 87 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 454
Write 108
Mixed 125
SusWrite 92
42% 195 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 20.6
121% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 51.4
83% 166 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 73%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
73GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 477 203 61 90 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 485
Mixed 408
SusWrite 231
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 62.5
209% 73.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 269
227% 330 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 116%
Great: 126%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
799GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2245 2159 1163 1175 1172 1165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
343% Outstanding
Read 2,540
Write 2,226
Mixed 1,647
SusWrite 1,513
444% 1,982 MB/s
4K Read 68.6
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 96.2
318% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,204
DQ Write 1021
DQ Mixed 1,107
831% 1,111 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 343%
Great: 372%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 103 104 105 106 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 92.3
Write 101
Mixed 93
SusWrite 104
72% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 63.2
MC Mixed 33.7
126% 44.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 10.9
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 111%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 693 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,131
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback