Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 661-$80 2,457 User benchmarks, average bench 50% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Memory 66.2 1-Core 50.6 2-Core 48.8 39% 55.2 Pts	4-Core 140 8-Core 148 19% 144 Pts	64-Core 146 9% 146 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85C1) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.2% Poor	Lighting 38.4 Reflection 28.2 Parallax 35.2 31% 33.9 fps	MRender 16.1 Gravity 37.1 Splatting 36.1 25% 29.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016) 20,831 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 45 74 71 68 56 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23% Poor	Read 164 Write 141 Mixed 162 SusWrite 67.6 30% 134 MB/s	4K Read 9.2 4K Write 24.9 4K Mixed 8.2 38% 14.1 MB/s	DQ Read 16.2 DQ Write 31.2 DQ Mixed 13.9 13% 20.4 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5458-002.A00LF 9905458-010.A00LF 99U5458-002.A00LF 9905458-010.A00LF 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.4% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 9.7 24% 8.27 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 7.2 19% 6.5 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16