Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo U9400 547 User benchmarks, average bench 32% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	28.9% Poor	Memory 54.5 1-Core 17 2-Core 24.1 25% 31.9 Pts	4-Core 22.8 8-Core 17 3% 19.9 Pts	64-Core 25.2 2% 25.2 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 320M 15 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Apple(106B 00D4) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 261.41 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.92% Terrible	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 2.92 Parallax 0.94 2% 2.08 fps	MRender 2.14 Gravity 1.77 Splatting 2.83 2% 2.25 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.92% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apple TS128C 121GB 532 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: CJAA0201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 82 97 91 114 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Read 142 Write 138 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 94.2 26% 114 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 17.7 4K Mixed 8.1 31% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 17.6 DQ Write 64.3 DQ Mixed 18.2 21% 33.4 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.83 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 3.9 9% 3.03 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16