Asrock J4105-ITX

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock J4105-ITX (all builds)
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180103
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '18 at 15:10
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4105 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	31.4% Below average	Memory 40.9 1-Core 32.7 2-Core 65.3 28% 46.3 Pts	4-Core 127 8-Core 129 17% 128 Pts	64-Core 129 8% 129 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4836 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.27% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 3.04 Parallax 2.31 2% 2.58 fps	MRender 3.24 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4.52 3% 3.39 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.27% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 451 383 287 287 288 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	97.8% Outstanding	Read 468 Write 449 Mixed 425 SusWrite 358 96% 425 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 61.5 4K Mixed 42.9 141% 46.6 MB/s	DQ Read 311 DQ Write 278 DQ Mixed 291 219% 293 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 128%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 21GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 137 Write 127 Mixed 72.3 83% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 69%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 7GB free Firmware: 1AC01110 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 65 64 66 66 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Read 90.3 Write 45 Mixed 60.3 SusWrite 65.1 48% 65.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 62%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 165GB free Firmware: 1AC01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 96 97 97 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Read 95.5 Write 45 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 97.1 55% 75 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Toshiba 9905711-005.A00G 1x4GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 8.5 25% 8.77 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 3 9% 3.17 GB/s	Latency 198 20% 198 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical J4105-ITX Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock J4105-ITX

CPU
Celeron J4105IntelBench 36%, 1,216 samples	21x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	21x

SSD
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	3x
MX300 275GBCrucial $100Bench 79%, 67,541 samples	2x
INTENSO 256GBBench 72%, 4,055 samples	2x

RAM
M471A5143EB0-CPB 1x4GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,518 samples	2x
HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 2x4GBSK_HynixBench 27%, 94 samples	2x
CT4G4SFS824A.M8FE 2x4GBCrucialBench 72%, 85 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 20% - Poor

Total price: $14

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16