Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X399 AORUS XTREME
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF (all builds)
Memory	27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181004
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '18 at 23:30
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 2920X 3,902 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Memory 64.8 1-Core 128 2-Core 257 80% 150 Pts	4-Core 507 8-Core 1,002 89% 754 Pts	64-Core 1,942 120% 1,942 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Lighting 39.3 Reflection 31.3 Parallax 37.3 32% 36 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 38.1 Splatting 35.7 30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 308GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1069 1092 1141 1167 1142 1158 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	229% Outstanding	Read 2,137 Write 1,202 Mixed 1,013 SusWrite 1128 304% 1,370 MB/s	4K Read 44.8 4K Write 74.5 4K Mixed 48.4 169% 55.9 MB/s	DQ Read 677 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 406 328% 473 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 229% Great: 393%
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$140 14,258 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 168GB free Firmware: 400i SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 159 172 168 164 172 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 350 Write 212 Mixed 224 SusWrite 165 53% 238 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 56.4 4K Mixed 32.3 122% 40.7 MB/s	DQ Read 293 DQ Write 206 DQ Mixed 222 174% 241 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 88%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 57GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 263 126 86 76 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Read 481 Write 387 Mixed 355 SusWrite 165 78% 347 MB/s	4K Read 40 4K Write 60.7 4K Mixed 44.6 150% 48.4 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 355 DQ Mixed 357 271% 364 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 124%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 969GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 112 114 117 119 118 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 140 Write 132 Mixed 80.2 SusWrite 116 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 86%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 894GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 114 117 117 117 117 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 113 Write 112 Mixed 81.5 SusWrite 116 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 86%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 2GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.4 5.1 5.4 5.4 5.2 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	7.15% Terrible	Read 29 Write 4.7 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 5.3 10% 10.8 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 28% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.15% Great: 16%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 2,465 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 628GB free, PID 2320 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 70 70 70 70 70 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	36.3% Below average	Read 97.5 Write 65 Mixed 52 SusWrite 68.6 91% 70.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 114% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB 76,101 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	135% Outstanding	MC Read 53 MC Write 56.4 MC Mixed 52 154% 53.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 31.5 SC Mixed 22 66% 23.1 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 135% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF Builds (Compare 153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 105%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 127%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

CPU
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $798Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	56x
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	27x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	26x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	29x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	14x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,280Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	11x

SSD
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	15x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	8x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 8x8GBCorsairBench 113%, 87 samples	5x
CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 29,525 samples	5x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 89%, 5,810 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $1,603

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16