| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8H61-MX R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120815 |
| Uptime | 9.9 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 07 '18 at 17:49 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | POL-User |
| Background CPU | 16% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58.4%
Above average
|
56% 85.8 Pts
|
26% 195 Pts
|
11% 177 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.5%
Poor
|
32% 37.5 fps
|
18% 25.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 48 28 35 55 67 MB/s
|
35.9%
Below average
|
54% 73.7 MB/s
|
130% 0.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
41.4%
Average
|
43% 14.9 GB/s
|
23% 7.9 GB/s
|
54% 74.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H61-MX R2.0 Builds (Compare 732 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H61-MX R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 109x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 108x |
| Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 54x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 65x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 54x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 33x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |