| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8B75-M (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20120301 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 03 '18 at 15:56 |
| Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
| Run User | ROU-User |
| Background CPU | 23% |
PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
70.2%
Very good
|
68% 115 Pts
|
44% 335 Pts
|
21% 342 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
20.1%
Poor
|
20% 22.6 fps
|
19% 24.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 250GB-$90
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 56 55 45 54 53 MB/s
|
52.7%
Above average
|
50% 224 MB/s
|
103% 35.3 MB/s
|
38% 58.6 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
101GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 54 54 45 53 52 MB/s
|
43.6%
Average
|
55% 74.8 MB/s
|
142% 0.93 MB/s
| |
|
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
81GB free, PID a00e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 61 62 68 64 58 MB/s
|
34.9%
Below average
|
100% 77.9 MB/s
|
87% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
28.8%
Poor
|
26% 9.07 GB/s
|
26% 9.03 GB/s
|
54% 74.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,498 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 387x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 205x |
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 131x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 103x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 97x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 87x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $906 |