Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics99% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory57.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171229
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 27 '18 at 04:57
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$455
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 80.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 215
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 924
83% 703 Pts
64-Core 1747
108% 1747 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.1
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 147
Parallax 126
101% 132 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 131
Splatting 107
95% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 99%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
301GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 767 622 622 622 621 623 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,678
Write 1,487
Mixed 622
SusWrite 646
247% 1,108 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 46.3
179% 71.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,027
DQ Write 883
DQ Mixed 835
658% 915 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 204%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
610GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 443 447 445 445 445 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 434
Mixed 379
SusWrite 445
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 42.1
145% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 358
269% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 106%
Great: 133%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$174
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 127 129 127 129 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 128
Write 127
Mixed 66
SusWrite 128
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 184 182 184 184 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 145
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 184
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR16GX4M2C3200C16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
115% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 65.3
MC Mixed 37.1
133% 46.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 11.3
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 115%
Great: 188%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,131
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback