Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140604
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateNov 25 '18 at 05:32
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$90
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 107
2-Core 183
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 600
61% 491 Pts
64-Core 759
47% 759 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Lighting 68.1
Reflection 72.3
Parallax 63.3
56% 67.9 fps
MRender 75
Gravity 61
Splatting 58.1
52% 64.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LX 128GB-$144
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N0307A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 138 124 108 107 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 454
Write 144
Mixed 205
SusWrite 120
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 30.4
106% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 156
129% 189 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 84%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
144GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1337 299 298 301 297 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1851
Write 1,491
Mixed 665
SusWrite 472
248% 1,120 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 43.6
163% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 759
DQ Write 487
DQ Mixed 616
461% 621 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 181%
Great: 236%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
283GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 57 59 60 58 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 89.2
Write 88
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 58.8
56% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
506GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 163 164 166 164 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 169
Mixed 84
SusWrite 165
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 109%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$47
122GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 123 121 122 123 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 129
Write 116
Mixed 81
SusWrite 124
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
220% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 105%
WD My Passport 259D 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 259d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 95 96 94 98 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 91.2
Write 83.8
Mixed 52
SusWrite 96
108% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C10 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 31
94% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION Builds (Compare 681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $421
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback