842p1 842P181G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System842p1 842P181G  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1400 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '18 at 15:32
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 920
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.4% Above average
Memory 78.2
1-Core 48.9
2-Core 95.1
48% 74.1 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 344
32% 266 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220
Asus(1043 830F) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.59% Terrible
Lighting 3.27
Reflection 4.54
Parallax 1.31
3% 3.04 fps
MRender 3.76
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.83
2% 3.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.59%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
456GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 361 363 345 353 363 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 657
Write 376
Mixed 408
SusWrite 358
100% 450 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 34.8
115% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 484
DQ Write 378
DQ Mixed 442
328% 435 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 103%
Great: 283%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 16.2
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback