Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	80% Excellent	Memory 92.3 1-Core 108 2-Core 207 79% 136 Pts	4-Core 368 8-Core 518 56% 443 Pts	64-Core 522 32% 522 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 278 276 282 285 278 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	96% Outstanding	Read 473 Write 453 Mixed 386 SusWrite 299 90% 403 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 60.7 4K Mixed 42.3 136% 45.2 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 364 274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 124%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 14,254 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 2.7 5 6.6 6.6 6.6 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	7.38% Terrible	Read 19.9 Write 5.7 Mixed 5.7 SusWrite 5 10% 9.07 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1 78% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.38% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 23,732 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 16.2 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 16.6 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 63.5 63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	82x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	63x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	58x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	21x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 23,732 samples	19x

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $442

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16