| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME A320M-K/BR (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180122 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 21 '18 at 22:10 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 16% |
PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
79.3%
Very good
|
71% 120 Pts
|
59% 443 Pts
|
27% 442 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
|
27.7%
Poor
|
28% 30.9 fps
|
28% 34 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 48 26 17 95 134 MB/s
|
46.3%
Average
|
62% 280 MB/s
|
66% 21.8 MB/s
|
37% 65.2 MB/s
|
|
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
260GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 101 101 101 101 MB/s
|
58.4%
Above average
|
68% 92.1 MB/s
|
194% 1.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2866 MHz clocked @ 1433 MHz
|
98.4%
Outstanding
|
103% 36 GB/s
|
80% 28 GB/s
|
52% 76.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME A320M-K/BR Builds (Compare 931 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K/BR
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 118x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 89x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 85x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 60x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 59x |
| Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples | 58x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $233 |