HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 836B
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171023
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '18 at 18:44
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	52%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Memory 80.2 1-Core 62 2-Core 137 56% 93 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 401 38% 314 Pts	64-Core 397 25% 397 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% HP(103C 836B) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9836 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	20.2% Poor	Lighting 24.5 Reflection 6.27 Parallax 26.1 20% 19 fps	MRender 28 Gravity 9.63 Splatting 34.8 21% 24.1 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33 44,050 User benchmarks, average bench 125% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 298 301 300 303 298 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	126% Outstanding	Read 1,361 Write 891 Mixed 602 SusWrite 306 175% 790 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 78.9 4K Mixed 35.4 119% 45.2 MB/s	DQ Read 367 DQ Write 321 DQ Mixed 293 233% 327 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 193%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 780GB free Firmware: JB0OA3T0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 126 127 127 127 126 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	73.4% Very good	Read 130 Write 124 Mixed 23.1 SusWrite 126 73% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GB 2,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	78.4% Very good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 32.9 MC Mixed 23.8 82% 28.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 26.6 SC Mixed 22.6 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 80.1 50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx Builds (Compare 2,452 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	1,679x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	771x
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	1,405x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	982x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	48x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $33Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	212x
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	102x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	91x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	240x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	210x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	148x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $33

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16