Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-4600M APU 5,886 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	49.9% Average	Memory 75.2 1-Core 56.2 2-Core 89.8 48% 73.7 Pts	4-Core 145 8-Core 145 19% 145 Pts	64-Core 143 9% 143 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660G 4,227 User benchmarks, average bench 4% HP(103C 194E) 768MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	4.94% Terrible	Lighting 6.03 Reflection 7.19 Parallax 6.03 5% 6.42 fps	MRender 4.81 Gravity 5.4 Splatting 7.39 5% 5.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.94% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 213GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 281 302 281 266 255 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Read 451 Write 386 Mixed 390 SusWrite 278 84% 376 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 62.6 4K Mixed 34.4 115% 40.7 MB/s	DQ Read 28.5 DQ Write 230 DQ Mixed 36.7 56% 98.5 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 129%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16 13,359 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 21GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 31.8 Mixed 19.5 26% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1.2 111% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 859B CT51264BF160BJ.M8F 8GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31% Below average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 10.6 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 8.8 21% 7.3 GB/s	Latency 90 44% 90 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 12,200 samples	6x
CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 1x4GBCrucialBench 24%, 1,138 samples	5x
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	5x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $88

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16