Asus 1011PX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, HDD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 6.66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus 1011PX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 1015PE
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '18 at 16:55
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Atom N570
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.66% Terrible
1-Core 11
2-Core 21.8
8% 16.4 Pts
4-Core 34.3
8-Core 33.9
5% 34.1 Pts
64-Core 34.4
2% 34.4 Pts
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.66%
Great: 7%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
R580 60GB 60GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01000015
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 109 105 111 104 109 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.1% Below average
Read 223
Write 117
Mixed 139
SusWrite 109
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 18.9
4K Mixed 11
46% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 87.5
DQ Write 77.6
DQ Mixed 74.5
58% 79.9 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled
10.5% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.33 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.7 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 27%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback