Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics62.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X399 AORUS XTREME
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF  (all builds)
Memory15.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180724
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 13 '18 at 06:42
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2920X
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 50.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 221
66% 126 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 776
72% 603 Pts
64-Core 1,737
108% 1,737 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.81
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.7% Good
Lighting 78.7
Reflection 78.9
Parallax 67.8
64% 75.1 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 73.2
Splatting 74.6
60% 72.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 443 445 390 372 367 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 448
Mixed 430
SusWrite 411
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 49.6
162% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 247
192% 261 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 108%
Great: 123%
SanDisk X400 512GB-$99
477GB free
Firmware: X4120000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 294 283 281 282 280 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 481
Mixed 362
SusWrite 315
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 41.9
142% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 236
204% 304 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 104%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$75
476GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 183 182 182 179 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 153
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 181
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
373% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
950GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 94 90 89 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
58% Above average
Read 112
Write 108
Mixed 95.1
SusWrite 89.9
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58%
Great: 67%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 152 152 152 152 152 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 142
Write 164
Mixed 83.9
SusWrite 152
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 89%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
904GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 110 111 112 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 103
Write 73.2
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 111
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 3x8GB
3 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.8% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 12.6
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF Builds (Compare 153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,603
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback