Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 B55 3,005 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	51.7% Above average	Memory 79 1-Core 36.3 2-Core 73.3 43% 62.9 Pts	4-Core 143 8-Core 146 19% 145 Pts	64-Core 145 9% 145 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 256GB-$115 11,742 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 136GB free (System drive) Firmware: O122 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 181 187 186 187 161 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.8% Good	Read 233 Write 186 Mixed 187 SusWrite 181 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 58 4K Mixed 36.1 123% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 37.8 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 51.3 45% 65 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 114%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$35 16,844 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 21GB free Firmware: 3.AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 36 39 39 39 39 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	24.7% Poor	Read 47.2 Write 18.9 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 38.5 25% 33.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 2x4GB 13,050 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM 1066 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.7% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 9.8 25% 8.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 7.5 16% 5.7 GB/s	Latency 82.4 48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 88%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	20x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	7x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	6x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	3x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $167

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16