Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 (all builds)
Memory	61.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170831
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 10 '18 at 02:20
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1900X-$110 7,071 User benchmarks, average bench 76% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Memory 63.8 1-Core 115 2-Core 211 71% 130 Pts	4-Core 337 8-Core 584 56% 460 Pts	64-Core 514 32% 514 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 341B) CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.11.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	Lighting 65.3 Reflection 64.7 Parallax 77.1 53% 69 fps	MRender 64.7 Gravity 58.8 Splatting 53.2 48% 58.9 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$31 23,658 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61130WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 195 198 187 182 202 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 468 Mixed 338 SusWrite 211 85% 380 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 97.4 4K Mixed 50.1 173% 61.8 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 280 229% 327 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 105%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2.5TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 187 189 191 188 191 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 182 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 189 102% 142 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 159% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 4x16GB 981 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 31.6 MC Mixed 25.4 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 31.5 SC Mixed 22.1 65% 22.6 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 137%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	144x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	42x
Ryzen TR 1900XAMD $110Bench 76%, 7,071 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	49x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	13x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	12x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	10x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	10x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 86%, 3,127 samples	7x
CMU64GX4M4C3000C15 4x16GBCorsairBench 97%, 731 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $981

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16