Biostar TA880G HD

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Biostar TA880G HD (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111111
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 07 '18 at 13:17
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175 23,835 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	58.7% Above average	Memory 87.3 1-Core 48.2 2-Core 96.8 51% 77.4 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 246 26% 206 Pts	64-Core 246 15% 246 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3643) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	Lighting 32.7 Reflection 30.4 Parallax 43.8 27% 35.6 fps	MRender 43.3 Gravity 39.2 Splatting 34.6 32% 39 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 160GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 289 294 292 278 274 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 219 Write 249 Mixed 238 SusWrite 287 56% 248 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 49 4K Mixed 32.3 105% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 33.4 DQ Write 68.4 DQ Mixed 43.7 35% 48.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 124%
WDC WD5000AAKS-00UU3A0 120GB 77GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 114 113 113 111 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 292 Write 246 Mixed 239 SusWrite 112 50% 222 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 62.3 4K Mixed 35.6 122% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 42.4 DQ Write 95.3 DQ Mixed 50.2 44% 62.6 MB/s

Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 591GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 189 190 193 193 189 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 146 Mixed 70.9 SusWrite 190 108% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 112%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 341GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 114 113 113 111 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Read 126 Write 115 Mixed 65.6 SusWrite 112 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.7% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 11.2 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 9.3 22% 7.8 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Biostar TA880G HD

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)