Acer AS5950G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer AS5950G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Base Board Product Name
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '18 at 02:27
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 60.7
2-Core 139
59% 96.2 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 346
38% 297 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6630M
Acer(1025 050B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.783.2.0
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
5.08% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 6.38
Parallax 5.38
5% 6.09 fps
MRender 5.86
Gravity 4.77
Splatting 6.22
5% 5.61 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.08%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 37 37 38 32 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 34.5
Mixed 17
SusWrite 35
22% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 99U5428-014.A00G 99U5428-014.A00G ACR256X64D3S1333C9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.7% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 14.4
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback