Gigabyte GA-970A-D3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-D3P  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '18 at 18:23
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 58%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 84.7
1-Core 47
2-Core 83.4
48% 71.7 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 334
29% 249 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.10.2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.3% Average
Lighting 47.4
Reflection 71.2
Parallax 87.1
39% 68.5 fps
MRender 71.2
Gravity 66.4
Splatting 57.3
52% 65 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 74 81 69 72 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
50% Average
Read 271
Write 332
Mixed 275
SusWrite 77.3
54% 239 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 31.5
103% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 31.6
DQ Write 63.9
DQ Mixed 40.8
33% 45.4 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 50%
Great: 124%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
9GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 37 39 38 37 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 97.3
Write 89
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 38.1
16% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 6.8
24% 8.2 MB/s
DQ Read 9
DQ Write 25.2
DQ Mixed 9.7
10% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 85%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
8GB free
Firmware: 506ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 84 88 87 89 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 102
Write 112
Mixed 117
SusWrite 88.5
24% 105 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 25.4
93% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 24
DQ Write 87.7
DQ Mixed 30.3
31% 47.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
15GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 30 31 29 28 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 20
Write 37.9
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 30
21% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
51% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 114%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
2TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 87 126 123 125 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 49.2
Write 66
Mixed 92.5
SusWrite 109
59% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 4.9
724% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
44.4% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 15.6
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 10.4
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-D3P Builds (Compare 637 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-D3P - $248

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $392
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback