Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac9,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple iMac9,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F2218FA9
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090427
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 29 '16 at 17:06
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8335
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 59.3
1-Core 26.2
2-Core 69.2
34% 51.6 Pts
4-Core 70.8
8-Core 62.7
9% 66.8 Pts
64-Core 64.6
4% 64.6 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 120
Apple(106B 0633) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4195
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
2.27% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 4.73
Parallax 0.81
2% 2.65 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 1.63
Splatting 3.43
3% 3.58 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.27%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$23
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 82.3
Write 78.8
Mixed 26.6
46% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.05
4K Write 0.16
4K Mixed 0.03
8% 0.08 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 3.2
8% 2.93 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac9,1 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac9,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback