HP Slimline Desktop PC 270-p0XX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Slimline Desktop PC 270-p0XX  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F2
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170522
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateOct 15 '18 at 16:03
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G3930-$28
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Memory 36.9
1-Core 53.8
2-Core 112
37% 67.5 Pts
4-Core 98.5
8-Core 102
13% 100 Pts
64-Core 100
6% 100 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 610 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 82F2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4691
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
1.54% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 4.73
Parallax 1.5
0% 2.1 fps
MRender 1.95
Gravity 3.23
Splatting 9.26
4% 4.82 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.54%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 142 134 106 112 135 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 160
Write 142
Mixed 32
SusWrite 129
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
115% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
663GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 15 12 17 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 34.2
Mixed 24
SusWrite 13.5
19% 26 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.2
112% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 63%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
524GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 96 81 80 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 80.3
Write 89.1
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 91.9
99% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 44%
WD My Passport 259F 1TB
890GB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 21 22 18 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 34
Write 33.5
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 21.6
38% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 45%
Seagate Wireless 1TB
28GB free, PID a313
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 33.8
Write 31.2
Mixed 30.5
40% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 31.5
Write 7.7
16% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 44%
WD My Passport 25E2 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 29 28 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 32
Write 30.5
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 31.6
42% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.2
46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.63 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 5.2
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 217
18% 217 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Slimline Desktop PC 270-p0XX Builds (Compare 399 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Slimline Desktop PC 270-p0XX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $200
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback