| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H81M (all builds) |
| Memory | 7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20131206 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 14 '18 at 13:02 |
| Run Duration | 108 Seconds |
| Run User | BGR-User |
| Background CPU | 23% |
PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-4330-$140
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
|
66.5%
Good
|
73% 123 Pts
|
30% 222 Pts
|
12% 194 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0412) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.5057
|
3.27%
Terrible
|
3% 4.51 fps
|
4% 4.61 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 101 123 119 108 124 MB/s
|
67.3%
Good
|
77% 106 MB/s
|
139% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
52.2%
Above average
|
52% 18.1 GB/s
|
39% 13.5 GB/s
|
67% 59.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81M Builds (Compare 207 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H81M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 45x |
| Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples | 17x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 16x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 18x |
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 18x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 15x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $352 |