| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 25.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130326 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 14 '18 at 08:44 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | POL-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.1%
Good
|
56% 89 Pts
|
32% 253 Pts
|
18% 295 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140
Asus(1043 845B) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
|
18.5%
Very poor
|
17% 22.2 fps
|
20% 25.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk SSD 64GB-$56
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 12 8.8 6.1 10 12 MB/s
|
25.1%
Poor
|
21% 99.1 MB/s
|
36% 8.93 MB/s
| |
|
WD Green 500GB (2012)
46GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 106 110 109 110 110 MB/s
|
57.2%
Above average
|
68% 92.5 MB/s
|
156% 1.07 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
96GB free
Firmware: 3.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 90 95 93 96 95 MB/s
|
54.6%
Above average
|
57% 77.6 MB/s
|
157% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/4G 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
23.1%
Poor
|
20% 7.07 GB/s
|
19% 6.77 GB/s
|
52% 76.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 787 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 193x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 191x |
| FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 102x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 63x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 53x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 33x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $152 |