Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 106% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 101% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 11 '18 at 12:31
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Memory 92.7 1-Core 136 2-Core 231 88% 153 Pts	4-Core 434 8-Core 798 74% 616 Pts	64-Core 1,112 69% 1,112 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 37A7) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.16 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	122% Outstanding	Lighting 164 Reflection 162 Parallax 157 134% 161 fps	MRender 182 Gravity 143 Splatting 107 114% 144 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 120GB 3,514 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 161 162 161 162 161 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 486 Mixed 405 SusWrite 188 88% 395 MB/s	4K Read 48.3 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 63.1 220% 79 MB/s	DQ Read 312 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 351 258% 336 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 911GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 172 169 170 169 170 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 217 Write 167 Mixed 95.5 SusWrite 171 119% 163 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Predator 2666 C13 2x8GB-$137 7,627 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74% Very good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 27.5 MC Mixed 20.9 74% 25.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 28.4 SC Mixed 24 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 62.7 64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF Builds (Compare 889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 86%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	397x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	183x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	105x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	105x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	102x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	61x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	36x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	31x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	30x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	32x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $56Bench 81%, 84,291 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $684

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16