PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Hp-pavilion GS387AA-ABZ m9080.it (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK Berkeley |
Memory | 3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20070927 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Oct 06 '18 at 15:44 |
Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
|
43.5%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
POV(1ACC 5214) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
|
1.85%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 59 65 67 67 63 MB/s
|
39.1%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$46
235GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 63 67 68 67 63 MB/s
|
38.3%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 500GB
207GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 20 20 20 MB/s
|
14.9%
Very poor
|
|||
WDC WD32 00BEVT-60ZCT1 320GB
168GB free, PID 110c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
|
13.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
15.9%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds