Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics38.1% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180213
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateOct 04 '18 at 22:54
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
SC Int 88.5
SC Float 108
SC Mixed 102
80% 99.8 Pts
QC Int 369
QC Float 386
QC Mixed 366
85% 374 Pts
MC Int 1,065
MC Float 1,148
MC Mixed 1159
168% 1,124 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3201) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Lighting 130
Reflection 105
Parallax 114
38% 117 fps
MRender 77.9
Gravity 109
Splatting 74.4
38% 87.2 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 45%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1783
Write 1,064
Mixed 482
243% 1,110 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 42.4
168% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 882
DQ Write 611
DQ Mixed 731
550% 741 MB/s
Poor: 140% Great: 233%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
73GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 87 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 132
Write 128
Mixed 65
SusWrite 85.6
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 107%
Intenso Slim Line 32GB
25GB free, PID 2910
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 13 15 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
9.8% Terrible
Read 36.7
Write 33.5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 13.7
27% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
32% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.8%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
64.1% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 24.1
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 19.3
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 94%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 4,272 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $1,046
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $66Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $157SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback