Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180213
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateOct 04 '18 at 22:54
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 67.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 214
71% 130 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 695
65% 541 Pts
64-Core 1,148
71% 1,148 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3201) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33% Below average
Lighting 43.4
Reflection 40.5
Parallax 35.8
35% 39.9 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 36.4
Splatting 32.3
29% 35.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1783
Write 1,064
Mixed 482
243% 1,110 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 42.4
168% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 882
DQ Write 611
DQ Mixed 731
550% 741 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
73GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 87 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 132
Write 128
Mixed 65
SusWrite 85.6
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 109%
Intenso Slim Line 32GB
25GB free, PID 2910
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 13 15 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
9.8% Terrible
Read 36.7
Write 33.5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 13.7
27% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
32% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.8%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.1% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 24.1
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 19.3
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,042
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback