PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 43.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R (all builds) |
Memory | 7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100824 |
Uptime | 5.9 Days |
Run Date | Sep 30 '18 at 04:53 |
Run Duration | 177 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-950-$100
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
|
47.1%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3684) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.7%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 54 50 54 55 55 MB/s
|
30%
Poor
|
|||
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
87GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 56 53 56 57 57 MB/s
|
43.1%
Average
|
|||
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB
835GB free
Firmware: 0107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
|
15.8%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 1TB
439GB free, PID 1023
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 17 17 17 22 MB/s
|
12.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
31%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 627x |
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 405x |
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 217x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 148x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 104x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 102x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $397 |