bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DX58SO
Memory7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130729
Uptime4 Days
Run DateSep 25 '18 at 11:23
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
J1PR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 93.6
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 142
64% 102 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 357
39% 308 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 36.9
32% 35.5 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 37
Splatting 35.6
30% 37 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.04V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 71 73 73 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 74.5
Write 73.5
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 71.4
51% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.3
232% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$20
384GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 90 90 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 86
Mixed 47
SusWrite 87.8
57% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 60%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
29GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 2.9 4.9 3.9 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
5.08% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 7.3
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 5.1
14% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.9
44% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.08%
Great: 18%
Generic MassStorageClass 64GB
44GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2 1.9 1.8 2.1 2.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 20.5
Write 12
Mixed 16.8
SusWrite 2
16% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.9
187% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11%
Great: 42%
Generic MassStorageClass 64GB
54GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 15 15 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 31
Write 25.8
Mixed 27
SusWrite 16.1
33% 25 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.7
240% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
45.5% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 16.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 12.3
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback