Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120514
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateSep 21 '18 at 12:35
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 80
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 194
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 324
43% 321 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.6% Average
Lighting 44.1
Reflection 53.6
Parallax 98.2
36% 65.3 fps
MRender 92.2
Gravity 91.4
Splatting 94.6
76% 92.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 164 159 168 187 197 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 329
Write 314
Mixed 294
SusWrite 176
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 31.7
113% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 138
106% 147 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 134%
Intel 330 Series 180GB
24GB free
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 143 140 148 163 154 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 285
Write 196
Mixed 200
SusWrite 147
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 26.1
91% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 152
123% 176 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 83%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
4GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 423
Write 374
Mixed 374
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 37.3
124% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 173
182% 301 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178
122GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 88 91 93 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 96.5
Write 94
Mixed 58
SusWrite 90.7
62% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
25GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 92 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 104
Write 114
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 91.4
69% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.6% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.5
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,004 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $581
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback