MSI Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7978
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978)  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '18 at 22:37
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 95
1-Core 137
2-Core 258
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 677
70% 562 Pts
64-Core 685
42% 685 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.1% Above average
Lighting 63.5
Reflection 68
Parallax 66.5
52% 66 fps
MRender 70.9
Gravity 60.6
Splatting 54.5
50% 62 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1041 534 310 311 310 313 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,498
Write 1,338
Mixed 1,069
SusWrite 470
244% 1,094 MB/s
4K Read 63.8
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 84.1
288% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 981
DQ Write 1,120
DQ Mixed 1,014
774% 1,038 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 224%
Great: 280%
Adata Premier SP550 120GB-$45
68GB free
Firmware: O1230C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 128 55 55 55 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 391
Mixed 359
SusWrite 87
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 47.5
173% 66.8 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 233
193% 276 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
818GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 189 190 190 190 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 188
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 189
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
915GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 170 170 169 167 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 171
Mixed 95.2
SusWrite 169
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
WD Elements 2TB
1TB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 66 66 66 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 64.5
Write 66.8
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 66.4
74% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
77% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 22.5
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 22.9
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 57.1
70% 57.1 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978) Builds (Compare 2,308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978) - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $589
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback