Asrock Z370 Gaming K6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	8.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock Z370 Gaming K6 (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180320
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '18 at 04:08
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Memory 92.6 1-Core 162 2-Core 325 104% 193 Pts	4-Core 648 8-Core 927 99% 788 Pts	64-Core 956 59% 956 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 372C) CLim: 2164 MHz, MLim: 2014 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	8.66% Terrible	Lighting 5.47 Reflection 1.08 Parallax 2.44 4% 2.99 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 32.7 Splatting 0.22 17% 23.6 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 8.66% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900612 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 467 Write 223 Mixed 89.8 56% 260 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 31.6 4K Mixed 17.9 41% 16.7 MB/s	DQ Read 34.4 DQ Write 40.4 DQ Mixed 65.6 42% 46.8 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 87%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49 47,332 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 40GB free Firmware: 0006HPM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 53 55 53 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Read 72.5 Write 63.5 Mixed 43.7 SusWrite 53.4 43% 58.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 58%
Toshiba MK3259GSXP 320GB-$50 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 298GB free Firmware: GN003J SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 88 89 89 88 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Read 90.5 Write 88.2 Mixed 20 SusWrite 87.9 52% 71.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.C8FADP 2x4GB 772 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	77.3% Very good	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 29.2 MC Mixed 22.1 78% 27.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 28.6 SC Mixed 24.3 67% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z370 Gaming K6 Builds (Compare 969 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Gaming K6

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	560x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	151x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	126x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	108x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	61x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	39x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	34x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	31x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	37x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $751

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16