PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P7P55D PRO (all builds) |
Memory | 1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20120927 |
Uptime | 5.4 Days |
Run Date | Sep 06 '18 at 12:26 |
Run Duration | 261 Seconds |
Run User | BEL-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66.4%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 5770
AMD(1002 2543) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
|
11.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
567GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 84 86 62 91 87 MB/s
|
55%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
910GB free
Firmware: 1AJ100E4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 98 118 89 112 107 MB/s
|
53.2%
Above average
|
|||
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
691GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 72 76 57 76 81 MB/s
|
37.7%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
912GB free
Firmware: 1AJ100E4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 83 88 66 95 90 MB/s
|
44.7%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
7.5TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 15 10 14 15 MB/s
|
18.3%
Very poor
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8
14GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 7.1 5.8 6.8 5.3 5.8 MB/s
|
13%
Very poor
|
|||
Samsung Portable SSD T3 1TB
164GB free, PID 61f3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 11 14 15 MB/s
|
33.1%
Below average
|
|||
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 29 21 28 30 MB/s
|
17.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 8GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
|
38.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 104x |
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 96x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 47x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 13x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 12x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $483 |