PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 43.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 26GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 26GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Apple MacPro3,1 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Apple Mac-F42C88C8 |
Memory | 18 GB free of 26 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20080229 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Sep 01 '18 at 00:55 |
Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 55% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5462
CPU-A ( 0 ), 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
43.8%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Nvidia(10DE 0984) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 72 69 89 103 106 MB/s
|
43.6%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
232GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 68 59 52 27 MB/s
|
36.3%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
446GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 107 109 107 109 MB/s
|
75.6%
Very good
|
|||
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
907GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 18 19 19 MB/s
|
14.9%
Very poor
|
|||
WDC WD64 01AALS-00L3B2 640GB
124GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 19 18 19 19 MB/s
|
14%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 26GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
21.3%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E54621stBench 47%, 772 samples | 98x |
Xeon E5462IntelBench 48%, 662 samples | 19x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X54821stBench 49%, 298 samples | 15x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples | 22x |
Radeon HD 2600-XTATIBench 2%, 1,081 samples | 11x |
GeForce 8800 GTNvidiaBench 6%, 5,568 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $388 |