Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	46.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2618-C1
Memory	83.9 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20101028
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Aug 30 '18 at 13:53
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5677 654 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	60.2% Good	Memory 82.2 1-Core 69 2-Core 127 58% 92.9 Pts	4-Core 208 8-Core 308 32% 258 Pts	64-Core 365 23% 365 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% EVGA(3842 6160) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.9% Average	Lighting 57.8 Reflection 54.6 Parallax 49.7 47% 54 fps	MRender 60.3 Gravity 54.3 Splatting 55.9 46% 56.8 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 56%
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188 42,397 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Gigabyte(1458 3515) 1GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Lighting 21 Reflection 24.5 Parallax 19.4 17% 21.6 fps	MRender 28.3 Gravity 22.1 Splatting 23.5 20% 24.6 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 422GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 105 105 103 103 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.2% Below average	Read 109 Write 106 Mixed 102 SusWrite 102 24% 105 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 30.3 4K Mixed 21.9 71% 23.3 MB/s	DQ Read 99.9 DQ Write 96.2 DQ Mixed 97.3 73% 97.8 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 134%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 1TB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 585GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 151 158 161 158 153 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Read 159 Write 165 Mixed 54 SusWrite 154 96% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.8 181% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 123%
Seagate ST9160827AS 160GB 1,041 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 137GB free Firmware: G SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 57 57 57 57 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Read 51.7 Write 55.7 Mixed 33.5 SusWrite 56.9 36% 49.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 33%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400 2.5" 320GB-$35 9,368 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1GB free Firmware: LVM1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 83 Write 70 Mixed 50.7 50% 67.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 50%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44 34,705 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 212GB free Firmware: A SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 87 87 85 86 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 76.3 Write 48.7 Mixed 45.3 SusWrite 85 47% 63.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12x8GB 575 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 12 of 12 slots used 96GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 15.9 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 8 20% 7.13 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS R670-2 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	14x
Xeon E5540IntelBench 63%, 486 samples	9x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56801stBench 71%, 2,389 samples	5x

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	9x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	9x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	6x

SSD
Mercury Elec 240GBOWCBench 36%, 15 samples	8x
Logical Volume 478GBLsilogicBench 45%, 9 samples	7x
JAJS600M256C 256GBBench 69%, 1,795 samples	4x

RAM
6x8GBUnknownBench 53%, 2,890 samples	11x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	8x
12x8GBUnknownBench 53%, 575 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16