Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics65.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180622
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 29 '18 at 14:58
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$131
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 91.6
1-Core 124
2-Core 247
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 721
76% 607 Pts
64-Core 724
45% 724 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.43
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.5% Good
Lighting 82.9
Reflection 82
Parallax 70.8
68% 78.6 fps
MRender 73.2
Gravity 74.6
Splatting 76.8
62% 74.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GMTE110S 256GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0213A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 32 33 44 35 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 1,366
Write 46.3
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 38.2
76% 365 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 21.9
105% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 32.2
DQ Mixed 2.2
46% 118 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 191%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
458GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 126 123 126 128 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 128
Write 126
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 126
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
466GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 112 112 113 113 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 98.8
Write 114
Mixed 49
SusWrite 113
68% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2666 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.9% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 14.3
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 17.1
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback