| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 0.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | QBEX QBEX-H61H2-M2 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | QBEX QBEX-H61H2-M2 |
| Memory | 0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110622 |
| Uptime | 2.3 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 25 '18 at 21:07 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58.5%
Above average
|
61% 102 Pts
|
30% 230 Pts
|
17% 275 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 3190) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
0.99%
Terrible
|
1% 1.09 fps
|
1% 1.44 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 69 55 60 59 54 MB/s
|
30.4%
Below average
|
17% 77.2 MB/s
|
65% 24 MB/s
|
62% 86.2 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
37GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 72 71 69 79 83 MB/s
|
43%
Average
|
48% 65.3 MB/s
|
155% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5471-047.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
21.9%
Poor
|
19% 6.8 GB/s
|
17% 6.07 GB/s
|
49% 81.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical QBEX-H61H2-M2 Builds (Compare 50 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: QBEX QBEX-H61H2-M2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 18x |
| Core i5-2310Intel $90Bench 65%, 15,623 samples | 12x |
| Celeron G530Intel $36Bench 46%, 3,833 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 29x |
| GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 2x |
| HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $77 |