Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	7.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	78.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6260U 1,781 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	49% Average	Memory 67.4 1-Core 57.5 2-Core 102 47% 75.5 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 173 24% 176 Pts	64-Core 164 10% 164 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Graphics 540 6,448 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Intel(8086 2063) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	7.72% Terrible	Lighting 11.1 Reflection 10.3 Parallax 9.97 9% 10.5 fps	MRender 10.8 Gravity 10.5 Splatting 0.09 5% 7.13 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.72% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB 28,058 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 280 252 251 253 252 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Read 406 Write 396 Mixed 310 SusWrite 262 77% 344 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 26.6 105% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 336 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 318 240% 321 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 122%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905624-009.A00G 1x8GB 171 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	51.7% Above average	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 35.3 MC Mixed 11 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 10.7 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16