Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N4200 10,928 User benchmarks, average bench 30% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	35.1% Below average	Memory 47.2 1-Core 41.9 2-Core 86.5 35% 58.5 Pts	4-Core 134 8-Core 138 18% 136 Pts	64-Core 137 8% 137 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 7,629 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 39BF) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4627 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	1.76% Terrible	Lighting 1.93 Reflection 2.62 Parallax 2.03 2% 2.19 fps	MRender 2.57 Gravity 1.93 Splatting 3.04 2% 2.52 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.76% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-000L2 256GB 539 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAV02L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 298 303 309 315 314 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 391 Write 339 Mixed 315 SusWrite 311 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 28.3 4K Mixed 15.4 54% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 218 163% 217 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 116%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB 50,921 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	24.7% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 8.3 27% 9.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.17 GB/s	Latency 171 23% 171 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N4200IntelBench 30%, 10,928 samples	250x
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	175x
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	142x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	99x
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	96x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	177x
RMT3170NE68F9F1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 18%, 710 samples	80x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	34x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16