Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMD AM9220AYN23AC

A6-9220 APU (2016 M.SR)

▲ 51140 ▼

2 Cores, 2 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q2 2017.

Average Bench: 29.2% (1365th of 1463)

Based on 4,762 user benchmarks.  Devices: 178BFBFF00670F00, 00670F00178BFBFF Model: AMD A6-9220 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G
Poor: 11%Average: 29.2% Great: 39%
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Popular builds with this CPU

Very poor average bench

The AMD A6-9220 APU (2016 M.SR) averaged 70.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 47.5Pts
Avg. Single Core Speed 43.6Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD A6-9220 APU (2016 M.SR) is 27.6%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD A6-9220 APU (2016 M.SR) performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Speed 64.1Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 66.4Pts

Average Bench

(Based on 4,762 samples)
Rank 136529.2%
Min Avg Max
13.2 Memory 47.5 67.7
21.7 1-Core 43.6 55
31.7 2-Core 63.7 84.6
32.9% 51.6 Pts
Min Avg Max
37.3 4-Core 64.2 83.9
38.3 8-Core 66.4 83.4
8.65% 65.3 Pts
Min Avg Max
34 64-Core 64.1 82.9
4% 64.1 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
40.5% Average
Memory 73.3
1-Core 37.8
2-Core 53.1
39% 54.7 Pts
4-Core 48.3
8-Core 49.7
7% 49 Pts
64-Core 45.8
3% 45.8 Pts
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
32.7% Below average
Memory 54.2
1-Core 51.1
2-Core 66.4
37% 57.2 Pts
4-Core 67
8-Core 73.3
9% 70.2 Pts
64-Core 66.2
4% 66.2 Pts
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
31.3% Below average
Memory 52.9
1-Core 38.7
2-Core 58
33% 49.9 Pts
4-Core 59.5
8-Core 56.4
8% 58 Pts
64-Core 75.6
5% 75.6 Pts
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
25.3% Poor
Memory 41.8
1-Core 45.4
2-Core 51.1
30% 46.1 Pts
4-Core 52
8-Core 58.4
7% 55.2 Pts
64-Core 57.1
4% 57.1 Pts
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
22.6% Poor
Memory 35.7
1-Core 35.5
2-Core 55.5
26% 42.2 Pts
4-Core 55.8
8-Core 64.3
8% 60.1 Pts
64-Core 72.9
4% 72.9 Pts
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
18.3% Very poor
Memory 30.9
1-Core 38.6
2-Core 40
24% 36.5 Pts
4-Core 33.3
8-Core 37.6
5% 35.4 Pts
64-Core 55.1
3% 55.1 Pts
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
15.6% Very poor
Memory 23.8
1-Core 29.6
2-Core 40.3
19% 31.2 Pts
4-Core 43.5
8-Core 45.6
6% 44.5 Pts
64-Core 43
3% 43 Pts
4,762 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,715,125 CPUs tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical A6-9220 APU (2016 M.SR) Builds (Compare 710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-bw0xx

CPU
A6-9220 APU (2016 M.SR)AMDBench 29%, 4,762 samples156x
GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples254x
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples155x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples99x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples23x
SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 10,347 samples22x
SD8SNAT-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 66%, 2,836 samples16x
RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples63x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 1x4GBMicronBench 33%, 13,712 samples49x
M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 42,779 samples44x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25

Popular A6-9220 APU (2016 M.SR) systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
9,996

Terrible (edit your comment) Add link

23 months ago.

It is the processor in my school Chromebook (Lenovo 14e Chromebook). I don't exactly like it, as it is extremely slow and hot (if it is under a heavy load for long enough it will start thermal throttling), but it gets the job done.

DEU-User
Avatar level
5,835

Good

4 years ago.

Ein eher langsamer Prozessor, welcher in meinem mittel Klasse Laptop sehr schnell ausgelastet ist.

IND-User
Avatar level
4,898

Good

18 months ago.

it can run games quite good for a mobile CPU and its integrated graphics are also quite good

FRA-User
Avatar level
4,651

Poor

2 years ago.

A pretty depressing piece of silicon from an architecture that was already underwhelming at launch. While it is good for the most basic of daily tasks, it didn't age as well as it's intel counterparts. It also tends to get quite hot, again due to the poor efficiency, despite not being able to do much of anything out of it.

AUS-User
Avatar level
4,020

Average

21 months ago.

I had this in my laptop for ~3 years that i mainly used for web browsing. But apart from that, it was a very slow laptop. Youtube ran decently well although it did stutter when entering and exiting full screen. I got a new laptop since then and it's way better than this.

NLD-User
Avatar level
3,584

Poor

4 years ago.

I have this cpu and it is sooooo bad

GRC-User
Avatar level
3,177

Terrible

12 days ago.

Very slow. Can't even run power point propertly

CHE-User
Avatar level
2,640

Excellent

5 years ago.

I have this new laptop with this Graphics card (AMD Radeon 530) but this proccessor just ruins all the Performance.

BEL-User
Avatar level
2,576

Excellent

4 years ago.

Like it sometimes jams and unlike what i expected it to be it was not responsing to my commands that quick.

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 7 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Intel Core i5-12600K
vs Intel Core i5-12400F
vs Intel Core i5-13600K
vs Intel Core i7-14700K
vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs Intel Core i3-13100F
vs Intel Core i5-12400
vs Intel Core i7-13700K

1463 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback