TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMD AD789KXDJCHBX

A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)

▲ 53183 ▼

Release date ≈ Q1 2016.

Average Bench: 47% (881st of 1442)

Based on 6,638 user benchmarks.  Devices: 178BFBFF00630F81, 078BFBFF00630F81 Model: AMD A10-7890K Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
Poor: 33%Average: 47% Great: 57%
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Popular builds with this CPU

Below average average bench

The AMD A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka) averaged 53.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 60.5Pts
Avg. Single Core Speed 66.9Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka) is 23.4%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka) performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Speed 197Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 196Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 6,638 samples)
Rank 88147%
Min Avg Max
40.9 Memory 60.5 76.9
44.2 1-Core 66.9 76.8
86.2 2-Core 122 141
49.2% 83.2 Pts
Min Avg Max
131 4-Core 194 228
130 8-Core 196 229
26% 195 Pts
Min Avg Max
134 64-Core 197 231
12.2% 197 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
50.6% Above average
Memory 68
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 127
53% 87.8 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 192
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
50.4% Above average
Memory 71.9
1-Core 67.8
2-Core 122
53% 87.3 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 183
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
49.1% Average
Memory 63.1
1-Core 69.6
2-Core 127
51% 86.5 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 205
27% 205 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
48.9% Average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 64.8
2-Core 111
49% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 188
26% 191 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
47.7% Average
Memory 66.8
1-Core 56.3
2-Core 94
46% 72.4 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 150
22% 160 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
46.7% Average
Memory 62.3
1-Core 56.6
2-Core 122
47% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 170
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
44.6% Average
Memory 55.2
1-Core 31.4
2-Core 103
37% 63.2 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 199
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
44.5% Average
Memory 59.4
1-Core 65.4
2-Core 115
48% 80 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 179
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
34.5% Below average
Memory 48.6
1-Core 66.5
2-Core 86.2
41% 67.1 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 135
16% 125 Pts
64-Core 133
8% 133 Pts
6,638 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,716,400 CPUs tested

 Prices

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

AmazonUS $88922 months
Send price feedback
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka) Builds (Compare 494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-PLUS

CPU
A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD  $889Bench 47%, 6,638 samples1x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples59x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples51x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples40x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples25x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples8x
RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples41x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples41x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples26x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $976

Popular A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka) compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
9,834

Good (edit your comment) Add link

3 years ago.

For all you noob PC builders like the other reviewers who hate this proc. It works prefect for what it was meant to be a decent entry to mid level processor and graphics cpu/gpu. I play games like stellaris and divinity, and pillars on ubuntu linux on this box and it works perfect(with the built in gpu). I am sure it would play dota2, fortnite and other e-sport games just fine as well. Don't expect it to play big bloated 3D shooters like COD and other such games well. Get a better proc/gpu for those games.

GBR-User
Avatar level
5,780

Poor

5 years ago.

This apu is not ment for gaming on its own but used as a cpu, it could be entry to mid range if you can get a decent deal on it if paired with dedicated gpu it could run aaa with little to no problems at 1080p

IDN-User
Avatar level
4,629

Terrible

4 years ago.

garbage APU!! getting freezes more than you can imagine when playing high performance games (like GTA V, far cry 5, yakuza 0 etc...) my setup is biostar 188mq, GTX 1060 6GB with 16GB ram ddr3 dual channel and SSD 512GB... the APU is expensive and REALLY not meet expectation at all.... getting more than 90 Celsius when playing those games (even though i change the heatsink with liquid cooler still not helping at all) from very disappoint person who bought this APU more than 3 years ago

FRA-User
Avatar level
4,573

Excellent

5 years ago.

its no for gaming and he have pice very high

POL-User
Avatar level
4,564

Good

4 years ago.

On windows 10 have few bugs with bluescreens in games

ITA-User
Avatar level
4,067

Good

3 years ago.

Good for office use and games at minimum settings

NLD-User
Avatar level
3,510

Terrible

3 years ago.

yo i have this thing and it sucks

Uxio121
Avatar level
10

Poor

6 years ago.

The APU is bad and is not meant for gaming, creating a terrible bottleneck with any graphic card

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 8 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Intel Core i5-13600K
vs Intel Core i5-12600K
vs Intel Core i5-12400F
vs Intel Core i3-12100F
vs Intel Core i7-13700K
vs Intel Core i9-13900K
vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs Intel Core i7-11700K

1442 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback